What do all ICT third-party service providers under DORA actually have to do?

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) sets strict, harmonised rules for ICT third-party service providers working with European financial institutions. But the core question remains:

What do ICT service providers actually have to do—practically, operationally, every day?

---

1. Support a single written, durable and permanently accessible contract

Under Art. 30(1) DORA, providers must support and maintain:

• one single written contract (including SLAs),
• which is downloadable, durable and permanently accessible,
• and which contains all rights and obligations.

This means ICT providers must ensure that the contract—and every update—is maintained in a stable, accessible, non-volatile format.

---

2. Deliver ICT services exactly as described

Under Art. 30(2)(a) DORA, the provider must deliver:

• all ICT services and functions,
• exactly as contractually defined,
• in a complete, unambiguous manner, every day.

This requires stable production operations, up-to-date documentation and reliable service delivery.

---

3. Operate only in the approved locations

DORA requires providers to process and store all data only in the:

• regions or countries explicitly listed in the contract.
  (Art. 30(2)(b))

Providers must implement strict geographic controls, mapping data flows and preventing deviation.

---

4. Notify the financial entity before any location change

Under Art. 30(2)(b), providers must:

• notify the financial entity in advance of any change of data location or processing site.

This prevents unapproved data transfers and ensures regulatory compliance.

---

5. Maintain information security

DORA imposes a daily operational duty to uphold:

• availability,
• authenticity,
• integrity,
• confidentiality

of all systems and data. (Art. 30(2)(c))

Providers must operate secure ICT environments, enforce access controls, maintain patching, encryption and network protection.

---

6. Guarantee continuous data access, recovery and return

Under Art. 30(2)(d), ICT providers must ensure:

• continuous access to data,
• restoration from backups,
• return of data upon request,
• and continued availability even in insolvency or internal disruptions.

This requires tested backup routines, export tools and robust recovery processes.

---

7. Maintain service level descriptions (including updates and revisions)

Per Art. 30(2)(e), providers must maintain:

• up-to-date service level descriptions,
• including revisions and updates,
• aligned with actual performance.

This must be reflected in daily operations and performance tracking.

---

8. Provide immediate assistance during ICT incidents

Under Art. 30(2)(f), providers must:

• support incident detection,
• assist with containment and investigation,
• help restore services,
• at no or pre-agreed cost.

This is not optional—incident cooperation is an enforceable operational duty.

---

9. Cooperate fully with supervisors and authorities

Art. 30(2)(g) requires providers to:

• answer supervisory requests,
• provide logs, data and documents,
• enable onsite inspections,
• and support resolution authorities.

This requires maintaining audit-ready documentation and technical access procedures.

---

10. Ensure termination readiness and minimum notice periods

Under Art. 30(2)(h), providers must:

• support termination processes,
• honour minimum notice periods,
• ensure data return and handover processes.

They must also maintain operational “exit readiness” at all times.

---

11. Participate in training and awareness activities

Per Art. 30(2)(i), ICT providers must:

• participate in ICT-security awareness training,
• engage in digital operational resilience training activities,
• cooperate in client-specific DORA programmes.

This requires ongoing staff involvement, not just a contractual promise.

---

Important Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS)

RTS TPPol

RTS TPPol

RTS SUB

RTS SUB

---

Source: BaFin, Supervisory statement: Guidance notes on the implementation of DORA for ICT risk management and ICT third-party risk management

https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Anlage/dl_2024_07_08_Aufsichtsmitteilung_Umsetzungshinweise_DORA_en.html

---

Minimum contractual clauses

Additional information

This table contains an overview of the contractual clauses that must be agreed between the financial institution and the ICT third-party service provider in accordance with DORA or the RTS TPPol and RTS SUB.

Contractual elements that should ideally be agreed but are not explicitly listed in the legal texts are not included in this list.

Column E marks contractual requirements that are only necessary for ICT services supporting critical or important functions (cif).

Column F indicates requirements for financial entities in accordance with Article 16 DORA.
Information for microenterprises in accordance with Article 3 no. 60 DORA is provided in column G, whereby microenterprises may also fall under the simplified risk management framework in accordance with Article 16 DORA. Exception: Micro-enterprises that fall under the scope extension pursuant to section 1a (2a) KWG do not have to apply the requirements of ICT third party risk management pursuant to sentence 2 no. 3 of this paragraph.

Area	Contractual clause	Location	Excerpt from the legal text	Critical or important functions only	Relevant for Art. 16 DORA enterprises	Information for micro-enterprises
Form	Written, permanently accessible document	Art. 30 (1) DORA	The rights and obligations of the financial entity and of the ICT third-party service provider shall be clearly allocated and set out in writing. The full contract shall include the service level agreements and be documented in one written document which shall be available to the parties on paper, or in a document with another downloadable, durable and accessible format.		X
Form	Written document with date and signature for significant changes	Art. 8 (4) RTS TPPol	The policy shall ensure that material changes to the contractual agreement are to be formalised in a written document which is dated and signed by all parties and shall specify the renewal process for the contractual arrangements.	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
ICT service description	Clear and complete description of all functions and ICT services	Art. 30 (2) (a) DORA	a clear and complete description of all functions and ICT services to be provided by the ICT third-party service provider, […]		X
Subcontracting	Admissibility of subcontracting (“supporting critical or important functions or essential parts thereof”) and subcontracting conditions	Art. 30 (2) (a) DORA	[…] indicating whether subcontracting of an ICT service supporting a critical or important function, or material parts thereof, is permitted and, when that is the case, the conditions applying to such subcontracting;	X	X
Location	Locations (regions or countries) of processing, storage or provision	Art. 30 (2) (b) DORA	the locations, namely the regions or countries, where the contracted or subcontracted functions and ICT services are to be provided and where data is to be processed, including the storage location, […]		X
Location	Notification of intended change of location	Art. 30 (2) (b) DORA	[…] and the requirement for the ICT third-party service provider to notify the financial entity in advance if it envisages changing such locations;		X
Security	Information security objectives and data protection	Art. 30 (2) (c) DORA	provisions on availability, authenticity, integrity and confidentiality in relation to the protection of data, including personal data;		X
Access to data	Ensuring access to data (e.g. in case of insolvency), restoration and return	Art. 30 (2) (d) DORA	provisions on ensuring access, recovery and return in an easily accessible format of personal and non-personal data processed by the financial entity in the event of the insolvency, resolution or discontinuation of the business operations of the ICT third-party service provider, or in the event of the termination of the contractual arrangements;		X
ICT service description	Descriptions of the service quality, including updates and revisions	Art. 30 (2) (e) DORA	service level descriptions, including updates and revisions thereof;		X
ICT incident	Assistance in an ICT incident, setting costs	Art. 30 (2) (f) DORA	the obligation of the ICT third-party service provider to provide assistance to the financial entity at no additional cost, or at a cost that is determined ex-ante, when an ICT incident that is related to the ICT service provided to the financial entity occurs;		X
Supervision	Cooperation with competent authorities	Art. 30 (2) (g) DORA	the obligation of the ICT third-party service provider to fully cooperate with the competent authorities and the resolution authorities of the financial entity, including persons appointed by them;		X
Termination	Termination rights and minimum notice periods in line with the expectations of the competent authorities	Art. 30 (2) (h) DORA	termination rights and related minimum notice periods for the termination of the contractual arrangements, in accordance with the expectations of competent authorities and resolution authorities;		X
Training	Participation in financial company awareness raising and training on ICT security and digital operational resilience	Art. 30 (2) (i) DORA	the conditions for the participation of ICT third-party service providers in the financial entities’ ICT security awareness programmes and digital operational resilience training in accordance with Article 13(6).		According to needs and ICT risk profile (see article 16 (1) (h) DORA), as article 13 (6) DORA is not applicable
ICT service description	Full description of service quality with precise quantitative and qualitative performance targets (including updates and revisions)	Art. 30 (3) (a) DORA	full service level descriptions, including updates and revisions thereof with precise quantitative and qualitative performance targets within the agreed service levels to allow effective monitoring by the financial entity of ICT services and enable appropriate corrective actions to be taken, without undue delay, when agreed service levels are not met;	X	X
Termination	Notice periods of the ICT third-party service provider	Art. 30 (3) (b) DORA	notice periods [...] of the ICT third-party service provider to the financial entity […];	X	X
Reporting	Reporting obligations of the ICT service provider	Art. 30 (3) (b) DORA	[...] reporting obligations of the ICT third-party service provider to the financial entity, including notification of any development that might have a material impact on the ICT third-party service provider’s ability to effectively provide the ICT services supporting critical or important functions in line with agreed service levels;	X	X
BCM	Implement and test business contingency plans	Art. 30 (3) (c) DORA	requirements for the ICT third-party service provider to implement and test business contingency plans […]	X	X
Security	ICT security measures (appropriate level of security, in line with the financial entity’s legal framework)	Art. 30 (3) (c) DORA	requirements for the ICT third-party service provider […] to have in place ICT security measures, tools and policies that provide an appropriate level of security for the provision of services by the financial entity in line with its regulatory framework;	X	X
TLPT	TLPT participation and cooperation	Art. 30 (3) (d) DORA	the obligation of the ICT third-party service provider to participate and fully cooperate in the financial entity’s TLPT as referred to in Articles 26 and 27;	X	Not relevant as TLPT is not necessary	Not relevant as TLPT is not necessary
Monitoring	Right to continuously monitor the performance of the ICT third-party service provider	Art. 30 (3) (e) DORA	the right to monitor, on an ongoing basis, the ICT third-party service provider’s performance, which entails the following:	X	X	see Art. 30 (3) last sub-paragraph DORA
Audit rights	Inspection rights for FU and CAs, including the right to make copies	Art. 30 (3) (e) (i) DORA	unrestricted rights of access, inspection and audit by the financial entity, or an appointed third party, and by the competent authority, and the right to take copies of relevant documentation on-site if they are critical to the operations of the ICT third-party service provider, the effective exercise of which is not impeded or limited by other contractual arrangements or implementation policies;	X	X	see Art. 30 (3) last sub-paragraph DORA
Audit rights	Restriction of audit rights in case of rights of other customers are affected	Art. 30 (3) (e) (ii) DORA	the right to agree on alternative assurance levels if other clients’ rights are affected;	X	X	see Art. 30 (3) last sub-paragraph DORA
Audit rights	Full cooperation in on-site inspection and audit	Art. 30 (3) (e) (iii) DORA	the obligation of the ICT third-party service provider to fully cooperate during the onsite inspections and audits performed by the competent authorities, the Lead Overseer, financial entity or an appointed third party; and	X	X	see Art. 30 (3) last sub-paragraph DORA
Audit rights	Obligation to share information on audit planning	Art. 30 (3) (e) (iv) DORA	the obligation to provide details on the scope, procedures to be followed and frequency of such inspections and audits;	X	X	see Art. 30 (3) last sub-paragraph DORA
Audit rights	Exercise of audit rights by independent third parties in financial entities that are microenterprises	Art. 30 (3) last sub-paragraph DORA	By way of derogation from point (e), the ICT third-party service provider and the financial entity that is a microenterprise may agree that the financial entity’s rights of access, inspection and audit can be delegated to an independent third party, appointed by the ICT third-party service provider, and that the financial entity is able to request information and assurance on the ICT third-party service provider’s performance from the third party at any time.	X		Option only exists for micro-enterprises
Audit rights	Information access, inspection, audit, and ICT testing rights	Art. 8 (2) RTS TPPol	The policy shall specify that the relevant contractual arrangements are to include the right for the financial entity to access information, to carry out inspections and audits, and to perform tests on ICT. For that purpose, the policy shall require that the financial entity uses the following methods, without prejudice to the ultimate responsibility of the financial entity:	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Audit rights	Audit by internal audit or appointed third party	Art. 8 (2) (a) RTS TPPol	its own internal audit or an audit by an appointed third party;	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Audit rights	Pooled audit and testing, including TLPT	Art. 8 (2) (b) RTS TPPol	where appropriate, pooled audits and pooled ICT testing, including threat-led penetration testing, that are organised jointly with other contracting financial entities or firms that use ICT services of the same ICT third-party service provider and that are performed by those contracting financial entities or firms or by a third party appointed by them;	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Audit rights	Third-party certifications	Art. 8 (2) (c) RTS TPPol	where appropriate, third-party certifications;	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Audit rights	Audit by ICT third-party service provider internal audit	Art. 8 (2) (d) RTS TPPol	where appropriate, internal or third-party audit reports made available by the ICT third-party service provider.	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Audit rights	Expansion of the scope of testing/certification when using certifications or test reports provided by the service provider	Art. 8 (3) (g) RTS TPPol	has the contractual right to request, with a frequency that is reasonable and legitimate from a risk management perspective, modifications of the scope of the certifications or audit reports to other relevant systems and controls;	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Audit rights	Retention of audit rights when using certifications or test reports provided by the service provider	Art. 8 (3) (h) RTS TPPol	has the contractual right to perform individual and pooled audits at its discretion with regard to the contractual arrangements and execute those rights in line with the agreed frequency.	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Exit	Exit strategies and a mandatory adequate transition period	Art. 30 (3) (f) DORA	exit strategies, in particular the establishment of a mandatory adequate transition period:	X	X
Exit	Exit strategy ensuring continued provision of functions	Art. 30 (3) (f) (i) DORA	during which the ICT third-party service provider will continue providing the respective functions, or ICT services, with a view to reducing the risk of disruption at the financial entity or to ensure its effective resolution and restructuring;	X	X
Exit	Exit strategy with adequate changeover option	Art. 30 (3) (f) (ii) DORA	allowing the financial entity to migrate to another ICT third-party service provider or change to in-house solutions consistent with the complexity of the service provided.	X	X
Supervision	Cooperation with competent authorities	Art. 3 (8) (c) RTS TPPol	The policy shall explicitly specify that the contractual arrangements: […] are to require that the ICT third party service providers cooperate with the competent authorities;	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Access to data	Access to data and premises	Art. 3 (8) (d) RTS TPPol	The policy shall explicitly specify that the contractual arrangements: [...] are to require that the financial entity, its auditors, and competent authorities have effective access to data and premises relating to the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions.	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Other relevant contractual clauses	Relevant contractual clauses on requirements under Art. 1(1)(a) DORA and other relevant laws	Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol	The policy shall specify that the relevant contractual arrangement are to be in written form and are to include all the elements referred to in Article 30(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554. The policy shall also include elements regarding requirements referred to in Article 1(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, as well as other relevant Union and national law as appropriate.	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Other relevant contractual clauses - risk management	ICT risk management	Art. 1 (1) (a) (i) DORA	[as appropriate, requirements applicable regarding] information and communication technology (ICT) risk management;	X	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant
Other relevant contractual clauses - ICT incident	Major ICT incident reporting	Art. 1 (1) (a) (ii) DORA	[as appropriate, requirements applicable regarding] reporting of major ICT-related incidents and notifying, on a voluntary basis, significant cyber threats to the competent authorities;	X	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant
Other relevant contractual clauses - ICT incident	Major payment incident reporting	Art. 1 (1) (a) (iii) DORA	[as appropriate, requirements applicable regarding] reporting of major operational or security payment-related incidents to the competent authorities by financial entities referred to in Article 2(1), points (a) to (d);	X	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant
Other relevant contractual clauses - DOR testing	DOR testing	Art. 1 (1) (a) (iv) DORA	[as appropriate, requirements applicable regarding] digital operational resilience testing	X	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant
Other relevant contractual clauses - cyber information sharing	Cyber information sharing	Art. 1 (1) (a) (v) DORA	[as appropriate, requirements applicable regarding] information and intelligence sharing in relation to cyber threats and vulnerabilities;	X	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant
Other relevant contractual clauses - risk management	Third-party risk management	Art. 1 (1) (a) (vi) DORA	[as appropriate, requirements applicable regarding] measures for the sound management of ICT third-party risk	X	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant	Not relevant, as Art. 8 (1) RTS TPPol is not relevant
Monitoring	Measures and key indicators to monitor performance, information security requirements and the financial entity’s policies and process	Art. 9 (1) RTS TPPol	The policy shall require that the contractual arrangements specify the measures and key indicators to monitor, on an ongoing basis, the performance of ICT third party service providers, including measures to monitor compliance with requirements regarding the confidentiality, availability, integrity and authenticity of data and information, and the compliance of the ICT third-party service providers with the financial entity’s relevant policies and procedures. [...]	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Monitoring	Measures for inadequate service quality	Art. 9 (1) RTS TPPol	[…] The policy shall also specify measures that apply when service level agreements are not met, including contractual penalties where appropriate.	X	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA	Not relevant, as the RTS TPPol is not applicable in accordance with Art. 28 (2) DORA
Termination	Safeguarding contractual termination rights	Art. 28 (7) DORA	Financial entities shall ensure that contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services may be terminated in any of the following circumstances:		X
Termination	Right of termination in the event of significant breach of existing rules	Art. 28 (7) (a) DORA	significant breach by the ICT third-party service provider of applicable laws, regulations or contractual terms;		X
Termination	Right of termination in circumstances capable of altering the performance	Art. 28 (7) (b) DORA	circumstances identified throughout the monitoring of ICT third-party risk that are deemed capable of altering the performance of the functions provided through the contractual arrangement, including material changes that affect the arrangement or the situation of the ICT third-party service provider;		X
Termination	Right of termination in the event of evidence of weaknesses in ICT risk management of the ICT third-party service provider	Art. 28 (7) (c) DORA	ICT third-party service provider’s evidenced weaknesses pertaining to its overall ICT risk management and in particular in the way it ensures the availability, authenticity, integrity and, confidentiality, of data, whether personal or otherwise sensitive data, or non-personal data;		X
Termination	Right of termination in the event of evidence of weaknesses in ICT risk management of the ICT third-party service provider	Art. 28 (7) (d) DORA	where the competent authority can no longer effectively supervise the financial entity as a result of the conditions of, or circumstances related to, the respective contractual arrangement.		X
Subcontracting - Termination	Termination rights in connection with subcontracting	Art. 6 (1) RTS SUB	The financial entity shall have the right to provide in the contractual arrangement with the ICT third-party service provider that the contractual arrangement is to terminate in each of the following cases:	X	X
Subcontracting - Termination	Termination rights when implementing material changes to subcontracting without consent	Art. 6 (1) (a) RTS SUB	the financial entity has objected to material changes to the subcontracting arrangements supporting critical or important functions and requested for modifications to those arrangements, but the ICT third-party service provider has nevertheless implemented those material changes;	X	X
Subcontracting - Termination	Termination rights when implementing material changes to subcontracting without consent	Art. 6 (1) (b) RTS SUB	the ICT third-party service provider has implemented material changes to subcontracting arrangements supporting critical or important functions or material parts thereof before the end of the notice period without approval by the financial entity;	X	X
Subcontracting - Termination	Termination rights in case of a not explicitly permitted subcontracting of critical or important functions	Art. 6 (1) (c) RTS SUB	the ICT third-party service provider subcontracts an ICT service that supports a critical or important function or material part thereof not explicitly permitted to be subcontracted by the contract between the financial entity and the ICT third-party service provider.	X	X
Subcontracting	Obligation to replicate relevant contract clauses in case of subcontracting	Art. 3 (1) (c) RTS SUB	the ICT third-party service provider ensures that the contractual arrangements with the subcontractors that provide ICT services that support critical or important functions or material parts thereof enable the financial entity to comply with its own obligations stemming from Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 and applicable Union and national legislation;	X	X
Subcontracting - Audit rights & access to data	Obligation to grant the same inspection and access rights in case of subcontracting	Art. 3 (1) (d) RTS SUB	the subcontractor grants the financial entity and competent and resolution authorities the same contractual rights of access and inspection as those granted by the ICT third-party service provider;	X	X
Subcontracting - Permission	Description and conditions under which subcontracting is permitted	Art. 4 (1) RTS SUB	The contractual arrangement concluded between the financial entity and the ICT third-party service provider shall identify which ICT services that support critical or important functions or material parts thereof are eligible for subcontracting and under which conditions. That contract shall specify:	X	X
Subcontracting - Responsibility for the provision of services	ICT third-party service provider is responsible for the provision of the services provided by the subcontractors	Art. 4 (1) (a) RTS SUB	that the ICT third-party service provider is responsible for the provision of the services provided by the subcontractors;	X	X
Subcontracting - Monitoring	Monitoring obligation with regard to the subcontracting of critical or important functions	Art. 4 (1) (b) RTS SUB	that the ICT third-party service provider is required to monitor all subcontracted ICT services that support critical or important functions or material parts thereof to ensure that its contractual obligations with the financial entity are continuously met;	X	X
Subcontracting - Monitoring and reporting obligations	Monitoring and reporting obligations towards the financial entity	Art. 4 (1) (c) RTS SUB	the monitoring and reporting obligations of the ICT third-party service provider towards the financial entity regarding subcontractors that provide ICT services that support critical or important functions or material parts thereof;	X	X
Subcontracting - Risk assessment	Assessment of all risks (incl. location-related ICT-risks)	Art. 4 (1) (d) RTS SUB	that the ICT third-party service provider is to assess all risks associated with the location of the current or potential subcontractors that provide ICT service that support critical or important functions or material parts thereof, and their parent company and with the location where the ICT service concerned is provided from;	X	X
Subcontracting - Location	Data processing and storage location of subcontracted ICT services	Art. 4 (1) (e) RTS SUB	the location of data processed or stored by the subcontractor, where relevant;	X	X
Subcontracting - Monitoring and reporting obligations	Specification of the monitoring and reporting obligations of the subcontractor	Art. 4 (1) (f) RTS SUB	that the ICT third-party service provider is to specify in its contract with its subcontractors the monitoring and reporting obligations of that subcontractor towards the ICT third-party service provider, and where agreed, towards the financial entity;	X	X
Subcontracting - BCM	Obligation of continous service provision at the ICT subcontractor	Art. 4 (1) (g) RTS SUB	that the ICT third-party service provider is to ensure the continuity of the ICT services that support critical or important functions throughout the chain of subcontractors in case of failure by an ICT subcontractor to meet its contractual obligations;	X	X
Subcontracting - BCM	Obligation of business contingency plans at the ICT subcontractor	Art. 4 (1) (h) RTS SUB	that the contractual arrangement between the ICT third-party service provider and its subcontractors contains the requirements on business contingency plans referred to in Article 30(3), point (c), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 and specifies the service levels to be met by the ICT subcontractors in relation to those plans;	X	X
Subcontracting - Security	ICT security standards of the subcontractor	Art. 4 (1) (i) RTS SUB	that the contractual arrangement between the ICT third-party service provider and its subcontractors specifies the ICT security standards and any additional security requirements referred to in Article 30(3), point (c), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554;	X	X
Subcontracting - Audit rights & access to data	Granting of comparable audit, information and access rights	Art. 4 (1) (j) RTS SUB	that the subcontractor is to grant to the financial entity and relevant competent and resolution authorities the same rights of access, inspection, and audit as those referred to in Article 30(3), point (e), of Regulation (EU) 2022/2254;	X	X
Subcontracting - Sufficient advance notice	Obligation to notify material changes to subcontracting arrangements	Art. 4 (1) (k) RTS SUB	that the ICT third-party service provider is to notify the financial entity of any material change to subcontracting arrangements;	X	X
Subcontracting - Termination	Termination rights of the financial entity according to article 6	Art. 4 (1) (l) RTS SUB	that the financial entity has the right to terminate the contract with the ICT third-party service provider when the conditions laid down in either Article 6 of this Regulation or the conditions laid down in Article 28(7) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 have been fulfilled.	X	X
Subcontracting - Notification obligation	Obligation to provide information about any intended material changes in subcontracting	Art. 5 (1) RTS SUB	The contractual arrangement shall provide that the ICT third-party service provider shall inform the financial entity about any intended material changes to its subcontracting arrangements well in time to enable the financial entity to assess: (a) the impact on the risks it is or might be exposed to; (b) whether such material changes might affect the ability of the ICT third-party service provider to meet its contractual obligations vis-a-vis the financial entity.	X	X
Subcontracting - Sufficient advance notice	Sufficient notice period in case of material changes in subcontracting	Art. 5 (2) RTS SUB	The contractual arrangement shall contain a reasonable notice period by which the financial entity is to approve or object to the changes.	X	X
Subcontracting - Right to object	No changes to subcontracting during the notification period or without consent	Art. 5 (3) RTS SUB	The ICT third-party service provider shall only implement the material changes to its subcontracting arrangements after the financial entity has either approved or not objected to the changes by the end of the notice period.	X	X

Source: https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Anlage/dl_Mindestvertragsinhalte_DORA_DE_EN.html